HylaFAX The world's
most advanced open source fax server
FW: FW: Old modem list
I have my modems connected to an HP E35 unix system with 8 built-in (sorta)
You will loose your external serial ports anyway. Even if you set your
external ports to COM1 and COM2 and set you internal modems to COM3 and
COM4, COM1 & COM3 will be trying to share IRQ4, and COM2 & COM4 will be
trying to share IRQ 3. You will not be able to use COM1 & COM3 at the same
time. Likewise COM2 & COM4. Although there is nothing in the design of the
IBM PC ISA bus preventing boards from sharing interrupts, the boards would
*have* to be designed with this in mind. Also, the OS and serial port
drivers would have to understand shared interrupts.
Some serial port boards let you choose IRQs other than 3 and 4, but not
many. If you have one of these, you can set your modems to COM1 and COM2
(IRQ 4 & 3) and set your serial port board to COM3 and COM4 *but* with IRQs,
say, 5 & 9. Or perhaps you could find internal modems that allow IRQs other
than 3 or 4.
I have never seen any ISA serial boards designed to share interrupts with
another board. Likewise motherboards with built in serial ports. Likewise
internal modems. Keep in mind that I am talking about sharing interrupts
between ISA boards. There are several serial port boards with multiple UARTS
that share an IRQ - but only on the one board.
From: Matt Kaminer [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 4:38 PM
To: Ken Cornetet
Subject: Re: FW: flexfax: Old modem list
You suggest the Supra fax modem?.. I wanted an external since I will have
two modems. I didnt want to use up both serial ports for the external
Are you using a serial port expander?
I agree with your assment of the internal modems!
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Ken Cornetet wrote:
> This may not be what you want, but in my opinion, internal modems just
> seem to work as well as external units. I suspect that modem manufacturers
> undergo considerable cost trimming measures on their internal units
> that the end user will almost certainly be a wintel person who already has
> been beaten into expecting mediocre operational reliability.
> External modems, on the other hand, tend to be used in applications where
> the user has a much higher expectation level.
> Then again, maybe the inside of PCs are just full of bad karma...
> In any case, I use a Multitech 1432BA and a Supra FAX 288 (upgraded to 336
> via latest firmware patch). The pair of these send almost 2000 pages of
> faxes per week. They both work exceptionaly well. Almost zero problems.
> Multitech does seem to lock up about once every couple of months. I've not
> tried to troubleshoot since it happens so infrequently.
> Two caveats:
> These are send only - I don't receive faxes with Hylafax.
> I am currently running version 3 of Hylafax.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> On Behalf Of Matt Kaminer
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 1999 11:56 AM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: flexfax: Old modem list
> I just bought a new computer to run Hylafax for two lines.
> I must now buy internal modems. Which ones work the best for fax and data
> (56k preferably)
> In support of my question, I submit the following statements:
> 1) I checked the FAQ, does contian modem list, but rather old
> 2) I searched on the archives, found modem information here and there, but
> no good list of modems that work 100% easily.
> 3) A response like "I have a Blah Blah modem, and it works perfect" would
> 4) I hope #1 and #2 are enough so that people on this list that get upset
> when you ask a question are calmed. and dont respond... read the faq..
> 5) SMILE!