Hylafax Mailing List Archives
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: [hylafax-users] [hylafax-devel] !!! USR/3COM modems and the latest CVS !!!
Lee Howard <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >But IMHO it's better not to use their Class 2.0 at all -- there are other
> >known firmware problems, at least for Sportsters. Why not to try Class1?
> Dmitry, by firmware problems are you referring to the Copy Quality Checking
> erronous "(0),(2)" report that most Sportsters make, or are there *other*
> firmware bugs in Sportsters' Class 2.0?
Yes, there are others :-( Here is an example:
> The reason that I ask is that I don't have any trouble with two 56K
> Sportster modems that I'm running in Class 2.0 - in fact, they perform
> better in most cases than my Rockwell Class 2 modems. So is HylaFAX
> somehow "working around" these bugs, or is the Class2CQQuery the firmware
> bug of which you're thinking?
That AT+FCQ=? response is a bug, but not the real one. Working around
*real* (fax protocol-related) Class 2/2.0 bugs usually is not possible :-(
Hope to hear from you soon,
____________________ HylaFAX(tm) Users Mailing List _______________________
To unsub: mail -s unsubscribe email@example.com < /dev/null